What programmes say moves their figures
None of them publishes a formula. The ones that explain themselves name a short list of factors, and they mostly agree. Each is attributed to the programme that says it.
Headcount
Replay sets its bands by employee count and calls headcount “a proxy” (Replay, checked 18 Oct 2026). Handshake AI sets a floor of 20 full-time employees (Handshake AI, checked 18 Oct 2026); micro1 sets 30 (micro1, checked 18 Oct 2026).
Years of history
Handshake AI wants 3 or more years in operation. Replay's form runs from under 2 to 10+ years, and Troveo's estimator from under 3 to 15+ (Troveo, checked 18 Oct 2026). MIT Technology Review reports that Sunset, a wind-down firm, weighs headcount, years in operation, data volume and tool use (MIT Technology Review, checked 18 Oct 2026).
Completeness and rarity
Turing ties its payout of up to $1M to how complete, rare and well preserved a record is (Turing, checked 18 Oct 2026). micro1 reserves its $2M+ tier for highly unique proprietary data.
Reasoning over volume
Polyshares says value lies in visible reasoning rather than volume, and prices only after seeing a sample (Polyshares, checked 18 Oct 2026).
Tools and depth
Mercor bases payouts on data volume, the tools connected and the depth of the data (Mercor, checked 18 Oct 2026). Replay's form asks about the share of English communication and whether a company owns a codebase.
Region
micro1 puts US companies first; Pewter's estimator rests on a payout model for US firms (Pewter, checked 18 Oct 2026). Figures are in US dollars as published, and no programme prints a separate European range.
About these ranges. They are published to attract companies, not to price a specific one. A written offer follows a sample review. For figures with real money behind them, see the licensing deals database.
